Intervention development | Intervention components | Perceived value, benefits, harms, or unintended consequences | Acceptability in principle | Feasibility and acceptability in practice | Fidelity, reach, and dose | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Specific objectives | 1. To what extent does the HANDY program needs to be refined or adapted to make it more acceptable to people with HOA, GPs and OTs, or more relevant or useful to the specific context in which it is delivered | 2. Which adjustments must be made to improve relevance of the management program for people with HOA and clinicians. Which aspects are fixed and flexible | 3. Determine meaningful and beneficial components, and identify unintended positive/negative side effects | 4. Explore the overall perception of the content and delivery described in the HANDY program and if it is relevant to implement in practice | 5. Explore to what extent people with HOA, GPs and OTs do think that the HANDY program can be implemented and if it varies across municipalities/general practices | 6. Determine number of referrals in the HANDY program, and number of occupational therapy sessions delivered for each participant with HOA Adherence to procedures described in the HANDY program, duration of each session of the occupational therapy intervention and if the dose was sufficient |
Data collection methods | Session specific registration forms filled in by GPs, OTs, and participants with HOA | |||||
Logbooks managed by investigators | ||||||
Interviews with GPs, OTs, and participants with HOA | ||||||
Assessment of ADL ability (ADL-I, AMPS), GAS | Numbers of completed ADL-I, AMPS, and GAS | |||||
Feasibility outcomes | Acceptability, relevance, utility | Adjustments made and reason for this | Meaningful and beneficial components, unintended side effects Change in ADL ability and level of goal attainment | Relevance and implementability | Implementability | Recruitment, dose (number of sessions and minutes per session) and adherence |